Residents of retirement villages in NSW call for new rules and an ombudsman to help them. https://t.co/8YkbtMzSxD #nswpol @GladysB @michaeldaleyMP @Matt_KeanMP
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 6, 2019
Sunday, 10 March 2019
Retirement Village Residents Stand for Parliament
NSW Labor Promises Retirement Village Ombudsman
Labor one-ups NSW government, promising retirement village ombudsman. #nswpol @GladysB @michaeldaleyMP @Matt_KeanMP https://t.co/gvDqTfYqac
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 6, 2019
NSW Retirement Village Ambassador
NSW government gives ambassador, not ombudsman, to scandal-ridden retirement village sector. https://t.co/aAZnEbeymw #nswpol @GladysB @michaeldaleyMP @Matt_KeanMP
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 5, 2019
Danger for Retirement Village Residents in Falling Property Prices
Falling property prices spell danger for #retirementvillage residents. Lack of capital growth will hit retirees hard when it comes to funding their nursing home entry costs. Many will need increased taxpayer support. #auspol @KenWyattMP @ScottMorrisonMP @Bowenchris @billshortenmp pic.twitter.com/3mZK1jsc1q
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 5, 2019
Ageing at Home - Elderly and Vulnerable Taken Advantage Of
Is anyone really surprised, https://t.co/UWOLWIZtJH . The elderly and the vulnerable taken advantage of again. Is it any different to door to door tradies offering to fix the roof etc. #auspol @KenWyattMP
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 5, 2019
Tuesday, 5 March 2019
Example 1 - Need for Retirement Village Ombudsman
Example of need for a #retirementvillage Ombudsman. Operator presents financial report and purports it to be audited but it is not. Complaint to @consumervic and @justice_vic, result, take it to VCAT!! @DanielAndrewsMP @MarleneKairouz @MatthewGuyMP @FionaPattenMLC @TaniaMaxwell14 pic.twitter.com/N014BA1IcH
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 4, 2019
Retirees Spiral to Financial Doom
Retirees spiral to financial doom because Minister @Matt_KeanMP likes #retirementvillages and thinks they come at no cost to government. But wow! Look at the cost to the retiree. Is it not government for the people not the developers. #nswpol @GladysB @michaeldaleyMP pic.twitter.com/Ls8zHKUxri
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 4, 2019
Seniors living boom in Port Stephens sparks calls for Retirement Village Ombudsman
Seniors living boom in Port Stephens sparks fresh calls for Retirement Village Ombudsman service.https://t.co/gT6nVrt0dN @GladysB @Matt_KeanMP @michaeldaleyMP #NSWpol
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 4, 2019
Friday, 1 March 2019
Retirement Village Emergency Safety Issue
Peak fire season highlights safety issue in Vic #retirementvillages. It's not compulsory under Vic law for operator to have an emergency evacuation plan or assembly point. Will we get through without a disaster? @sdanck @DanielAndrewsMP @MarleneKairouz #vicpol @TaniaMaxwell14 pic.twitter.com/OuC1O7Y1mJ
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) March 1, 2019
Thursday, 28 February 2019
High Retirement Village Lease Rate Costs
Long time advocate for Retirement Village reform Charles Adams states:-
Retirement village operators got their siphon into aged retirees’ savings, sanctioned by the Retirement Village Act Victoria in 1986. It is so skewed in operators favour, all Australia wide, immediately adopted the resulting contract format. That 1986 legislated definition of a Victorian “retirement village” mandates that you, the downsizing retiree, pay up front for a unit, as if you are buying it. That payment, defined in the Retirement Village Act definition, misleadingly as an “ingoing donation”, really is an interest free loan for the duration of the lease, and often months after. Five, or 25 years later, you, the exited lessee, in an aged care facility, or pushing up daisies, are unlikely to remonstrate successfully.
To get that government deal, the operators in Victoria in 1986, recommended to the Act drafters that having the capital, and a profit, provided by the prospective retiree resident, for a unit immediately, would enable them to build more retirement villages. That sounded incredibly attractive to state governments with ageing populations. Also, it would free up family housing so it was a win-win situation for the government, and for the operators. Now 33 years later only 5.7% of the over 65 year demographic are in Australian villages, while in the USA, where they mostly have simple residential tenancy contracts, the comparable figure is 15%.
After at least 6 ineffective Act reviews over the last 33 years, all dominated by the big operators and their corporate legal eagles, and also a 2 year Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Committee (LSIC) inquiry 2016-7 into the retirement housing sector, it is time to fix the skewed definitions as follows:-
A retirement village is a managed group of dwellings intended for retirees over the age of 55 years and their partners.
Replace the “in-going contribution” definition with Contracts Contracts
(a) All people seeking entry to a retirement village unit shall be offered a residential tenancy contract with secure tenure, with daily rental costs inclusive of all service, management, municipal rates, external building maintenance costs, and common property maintenance costs.
(b) Only then may alternative contracts be offered, including those requiring prepayment of an interest-free loan for the duration of the lease.
(c) All maintenance and service fees shall terminate no later than 45 days after the unit is vacated.
(d) The terms “ingoing contribution” or “donation” shall be illegal in any retirement village contract.
Evident from the LSIC review, the single most pressing other motion required of the Victorian legislature, would be the authorization for a “retiree housing ombudsman”.
Another review, overseen by the operators and their slick city corporate lawyers would just be another lawyers’ picnic, like the previous six. This will not benefit us retiree lessees but will make future retirement villages contracts much more cost transparent and more affordable and attract a greater portion of retirees. This can be easily fixed now, by the Victorian and NSW governments.
Retirement village operators got their siphon into aged retirees’ savings, sanctioned by the Retirement Village Act Victoria in 1986. It is so skewed in operators favour, all Australia wide, immediately adopted the resulting contract format. That 1986 legislated definition of a Victorian “retirement village” mandates that you, the downsizing retiree, pay up front for a unit, as if you are buying it. That payment, defined in the Retirement Village Act definition, misleadingly as an “ingoing donation”, really is an interest free loan for the duration of the lease, and often months after. Five, or 25 years later, you, the exited lessee, in an aged care facility, or pushing up daisies, are unlikely to remonstrate successfully.
To get that government deal, the operators in Victoria in 1986, recommended to the Act drafters that having the capital, and a profit, provided by the prospective retiree resident, for a unit immediately, would enable them to build more retirement villages. That sounded incredibly attractive to state governments with ageing populations. Also, it would free up family housing so it was a win-win situation for the government, and for the operators. Now 33 years later only 5.7% of the over 65 year demographic are in Australian villages, while in the USA, where they mostly have simple residential tenancy contracts, the comparable figure is 15%.
After at least 6 ineffective Act reviews over the last 33 years, all dominated by the big operators and their corporate legal eagles, and also a 2 year Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Committee (LSIC) inquiry 2016-7 into the retirement housing sector, it is time to fix the skewed definitions as follows:-
A retirement village is a managed group of dwellings intended for retirees over the age of 55 years and their partners.
Replace the “in-going contribution” definition with Contracts Contracts
(a) All people seeking entry to a retirement village unit shall be offered a residential tenancy contract with secure tenure, with daily rental costs inclusive of all service, management, municipal rates, external building maintenance costs, and common property maintenance costs.
(b) Only then may alternative contracts be offered, including those requiring prepayment of an interest-free loan for the duration of the lease.
(c) All maintenance and service fees shall terminate no later than 45 days after the unit is vacated.
(d) The terms “ingoing contribution” or “donation” shall be illegal in any retirement village contract.
Evident from the LSIC review, the single most pressing other motion required of the Victorian legislature, would be the authorization for a “retiree housing ombudsman”.
Another review, overseen by the operators and their slick city corporate lawyers would just be another lawyers’ picnic, like the previous six. This will not benefit us retiree lessees but will make future retirement villages contracts much more cost transparent and more affordable and attract a greater portion of retirees. This can be easily fixed now, by the Victorian and NSW governments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Function of Government
The role of government is to create an environment for commerce to function whilst at the same time protecting retirees and particularly vulnerable retirees from both financial and emotional harm emanating from that function.
The Victorian Retirement Villages Act 1986 provides the environment for commerce to function but fails to fully protect retirees from financial and emotional harm as a result of it.
The Victorian legislative definition of a retirement village in demanding the payment of an 'in-going' amount without the transfer of property ownership is a major contributor to that financial and emotional harm suffered by retirees.
Popular Posts
-
Victorian legislators failed retirees with an inability to fully understand the Retirement Village industry, the Deferred Management Fee bus... -
What is wrong with Victorian loan/lease retirement villages? Property Ownership is never granted. You paid for it but you don't get to... -
The following is an article published in the September newsletter of the consumer and advocate body Residents of Retirement Villages Victori...