"Living in a retirement village has the capacity to be a great lifestyle decision, sadly it also has the capacity to be your very worst financial decision." - RETVILLDOTNET.
An example for a village with the Deferred Management Fee calculated on the ingoing $$$.

"My father must have been one of the few people who lost money when he sold his home in a booming Melbourne property market. This huge loss on his home, in a popular suburb not far from the CBD, was despite it selling for more than he paid for it. The problem? He bought into a retirement village." - Diana Thorp. Sunday Herald Sun. 22/08/21
An example for a village with the Deferred Management Fee calculated on the outgoing $$$.

Saturday 17 October 2020

What Is Wrong With Victorian Retirement Villages

 What is wrong with Victorian Retirement Villages - 

The critical importance of retirement village resident submissions to Victorian state government inquiries is that they are actually living the experience and not just studying it. They know what is wrong because they have experienced it, suffered from it. 

They found that there is almost zero protection when something goes wrong, or the system to obtain that protection is so cumbersome, so demanding of them that surrender is ultimately the chosen option.

All this from a Victorian government that fails to enforce the law as it is currently written, let alone to improve it to protect the very people it was originally written for.

"The law was clearly on the side of the village residents. It was a lack of access to affordable, quick, decisive enforcement of the law the failed them most." -  retvill.net

Retirement villages, the process of for-profit operators seeking financial reward from this commercial activity under the guise of the benevolent provision of retirement housing for older Victorians. Sadly and particularly in Victoria the commercial risks are dampened by statute whilst the commercial rewards are enhanced by statute. For village residents it is the complete opposite, the risks are enhanced by statute whilst the rewards are dampened by statute.

"Families need to be aware that what we are talking about here is the transfer of intergenerational wealth, not to families, but into the pockets of large multi-nationals. Shame about elderly people not having enough money for aged care." 
Tom Gait, Retirement Village Residents Association.

So what is wrong with Victorian retirement villages? the answer is the State Government, Legislators. 

The collective failure of legislators to listen to the very people who know what is wrong, where it goes wrong and how to fix it, the village residents. The village residents are the only ones who are living the impacts of poor legislation, sub-standard management practices, unlawful practices and the failure of the responsible authority to enforce the law as currently written.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Function of Government

The role of government is to create an environment for commerce to function whilst at the same time protecting retirees and particularly vulnerable retirees from both financial and emotional harm emanating from that function.

The Victorian Retirement Villages Act 1986 provides the environment for commerce to function but fails to fully protect retirees from financial and emotional harm as a result of it.

The Victorian legislative definition of a retirement village in demanding the payment of an 'in-going' amount without the transfer of property ownership is a major contributor to that financial and emotional harm suffered by retirees.


retvill.net

Popular Posts