Thursday, 17 September 2026

Retirement villages. The $100 million bureaucratic jumble

Potential gap between what retirement village operators charge residents and the actual cost could hit retirees for up to $138 million, retiree rights advocate writes.

Residents at retirement villages operating under Victoria’s Retirement Villages Act 1986 (RV Act) are being charged more for village maintenance and management — the service charge — than what the law requires.

This occurs where operators deny residents the statutory right to choose to pay a service charge from two separate values — the service charge as proposed by the operator, or an independently calculated benchmark value.

According to the legislation, residents are not required to pay a monthly service charge higher than this independently calculated, CPI-compounding benchmark value — unless the residents agree to do so (except for the first year. The service charge is based on the operator’s estimated operating costs for maintenance and management of the village for the new village year; the benchmark value compounds each year using the % change in the Australian Bureau of Statistics Table 9 Melbourne CPI index.

See the full story at the link below - 

Retirement villages. The $100 million bureaucratic jumble

No comments:

Post a Comment

Function of Government

The role of government is to create an environment for commerce to function whilst at the same time protecting retirees and particularly vulnerable retirees from both financial and emotional harm emanating from that function.

The Victorian Retirement Villages Act 1986 provides the environment for commerce to function but fails to fully protect retirees from financial and emotional harm as a result of it.

The Victorian legislative definition of a retirement village in demanding the payment of an 'in-going' amount without the transfer of property ownership is a major contributor to that financial and emotional harm suffered by retirees.


retvill.net

Popular Posts

Labels